We can adduce as much statistical evidence as we like for analysis and predictions, but part of politics will always be unquantifiable and subject to judgement
I listened to two Starmer interviews on sat whilst cleaning. He comes across as decent, thoughtful, passionate, but dull. He has no overt sparkle or fire that lifts him up and turns peoples heads. He wouldnt be man to lead you over the top. He's a Capt Darling. Pens, paperclips and papers. Nice chap, plays good game, claims he hates losing, so maybe he is ruthless, which may catch his opponents off guard. Its unfortunate his voice is bit of a drawl, and seems to have no accent. He cant be placed. Again possibly an adavatage,just like Rayners staunch Mancunian flat vowels may alienate some and attract others. Whether he will make a good PM, who kniws. Often its shaled by unforeseen events and factors even PM cannot influence. Lets wait and see.
I listened to two Starmer interviews on sat whilst cleaning. He comes across as decent, thoughtful, passionate, but dull. He has no overt sparkle or fire that lifts him up and turns peoples heads. He wouldnt be man to lead you over the top. He's a Capt Darling. Pens, paperclips and papers. Nice chap, plays good game, claims he hates losing, so maybe he is ruthless, which may catch his opponents off guard. Its unfortunate his voice is bit of a drawl, and seems to have no accent. He cant be placed. Again possibly an adavatage,just like Rayners staunch Mancunian flat vowels may alienate some and attract others. Whether he will make a good PM, who kniws. Often its shaled by unforeseen events and factors even PM cannot influence. Lets wait and see.