Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lee's avatar

Separate to my below point and this one actually related to your column

You focus purely on Europe, but this part made me think of Australia

'There was a flowering of explicitly social democratic parties in the decades of the 19th century, from the Danish Social Democrats in 1871 to the Social Democratic Party in Finland in 1899'

The Australian Labor Party was formed in 1901, so basically at Federation and formed the first Labor Minority Govt in 1904 and the first Labor Majority Govt in 1910, does this make us one of the oldest Social Democratic Partys to win power in the world?

Expand full comment
Lee's avatar

Eliot, I have had what I think is most likely a crazy thought, but you are an open minded guy with an interest in history so wanted to run it past you.

For the best part of a century we have just accepted that WW1 was the incubator of the Fascist Partys that grew in Europe in the 1920s. However, as we see now many of the same demographics (young men, the lower-middle classes/petit bourgeois) move the hard right in the wake of COVID, is it possible that historians have historically under-played the role the Spanish Flu played in the growth of European Fascism? I know there are real differences, for one they I don't believe had lockdowns for the Spanish Flu and certainly didn't have Furlough schemes, but still the fact remains that after both the Spanish Flu and now COVID we have seen a political move in the same direction across broadly similar groups.

So totally crazy stupid theory, or possibly something to it worth investigating further?

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts